Elon Musk’s X Faces Legal Blow As Court Rejects Appeal To Access Trump’s DMs

In a legal setback for Elon Musk’s X, a federal appeals court has refused to reconsider a ruling allowing special counsel Jack Smith access to Donald Trump’s private communications on X, formerly known as Twitter. However, although the court declined to revisit the issue, conservative judges criticized their liberal counterparts, asserting that the prior rulings represented an unjustified erosion of executive privilege.

Notably, this decision could set a precedent affecting the confidentiality of presidential communications in the digital age, with significant implications for platforms like X.

Elon Musk’s X Faces Legal Setback

X, under the leadership of Elon Musk, faces a significant legal blow as a federal appeals court rejects the platform’s appeal against a ruling that granted investigators access to Donald Trump’s X, formerly Twitter, direct messages. Notably, despite the refusal to reconsider the case, conservative judges took the opportunity to criticize their liberal colleagues and the lower court judge for what they deemed a substantial and unjustified erosion of executive privilege.

The conservative judges, led by Donald Trump appointee Neomi Rao, expressed concern about the potential ramifications of allowing investigators access to a sitting president’s privileged communications without prior notification. They argued that such actions could undermine the presidency itself, extending beyond the specific investigation into Trump’s X data.

Meanwhile, according to a Politico report that cited the court filing, all four GOP-appointed judges on the D.C. Circuit Court highlighted executive privilege, defending the President’s right to confidential communications. However, despite considering the dispute over accessing Trump’s X private messages irrelevant, the conservative judges stressed the importance of safeguarding presidential confidentiality.

Notably, this dynamic adds complexity to the legal discourse surrounding the case, as the judiciary grapples with the delicate balance between transparency and protecting confidential advice in the realm of executive power.

Also Read: Ripple Moves 80 Mln XRP Sparking Speculations, What’s Next?

Executive Privilege at Stake

The legal battle involving X, Donald Trump, and special counsel Jack Smith took a new turn as a federal appeals court denied X’s appeal to revisit the ruling on accessing Trump’s X communications. For context, last February, Smith obtained a wealth of ex-US President Donald Trump’s X data as part of an investigation into alleged interference in the 2020 election.

As previously mentioned, while the court’s conservative judges acknowledge the moot nature of the underlying dispute, they raised concerns about the potential abuse of executive privilege. Notably, the decision, though a blow for X, doesn’t entirely close the door as the platform as the platform may consider appealing to the Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, the conservative wing criticized the process by which Smith obtained the data, citing an “end-run around executive privilege”, the filing showed. In addition, they argued that Donald Trump should have had the opportunity to assert privilege before his account information was handed over to prosecutors.

Notably, this case underscores the complex interplay between digital platforms, executive privilege, and legal proceedings in the evolving landscape of communication and privacy.

Also Read: SBF’s Parents Joseph Bankman & Barbara Fried Seek To Dismiss FTX Clawback Lawsuit

Source