Newly Revealed Satoshi Email Correspondence with Martti Malmi

Satoshi Nakamoto’s earliest collaborator Martii ‘Sirius’ Malmi has released their entire email history. At 120 pages, its the most significant addition to the archives of #Bitcoin’s unknown inventor. Here are the most important new findings:

When asked how #Bitcoin might scale in the future, Satoshi theorized the network would have a maximum of 100,000 nodes. Here he goes into the calculations assessing the economics of bandwidth costs to nodes (read: miners) in propagating transactions across the network, as well as the economic cost that would incur and how that could be cost effectively passed on to users. He also discusses the implementation of users paying fees, and hints at the potential for the fee necessary for confirmation of your transaction being market driven due to the processing capacity of the network.

Note: About 50,000 nodes run the software today

Satoshi believed #Bitcoin mining would be less energy intensive than the legacy banking system when considering the operational costs of bank infrastructure, i.e. maintaining real estate and the incurred costs of those building, ancillary costs such as mail transportation costs, etc.

Note: This is by far his best new quote.

Satoshi foresaw at least one viable, non-monetary use for #Bitcoin, describing the possibility of time stamping a hash into a transaction in the blockchain to prove that a piece of data existed when that block was mined.

Satoshi describing the differences between #Bitcoin and DigiCash, David Chaum’s failed e-money This is notable as Chaum’s work had a profound impact on the cypherpunks, including Hal Finney. He specifically discusses the differences in privacy properties of the two models, and notes that unlike Chaum’s scheme did not support an offline model, requiring all participants to be online to make use of the system.

He also explains the finite supply cap of bitcoin.

Satoshi was concerned about his legal risk in launching #Bitcoin, noting he was “uncomfortable” with explicitly labeling it an investment.

Note: Here also we see he didn’t come up with the term “cryptocurrency” himself.

By July 2009, Satoshi was tired, saying he “needed a break” from Bitcoin. Here, he also explains Hal’s absence from the work. He also mentions spending a period of 18 months at that point developing Bitcoin.

A curious note as well, he asks Malmi if he had any ideas for applications people can actually use Bitcoin for.

Satoshi discussing how #Bitcoin might gain adoption. Of note is his emphasis that Bitcoin was easy to obtain given that you could mine it on a computer. He also goes to postulate how the nature of a market trading for Bitcoin would evolve, discussing how skeptical people might be of its value, stating he was confident the increasing mining difficulty would prove its scarcity to people.

Very different from how we think about BTC today in terms of acquiring it, but demonstrating a prescience of how people would mentally value it in the future.

In June 2010, someone offered to donate $2,000 to Satoshi for his #Bitcoin work. Notably, he had the donor send it to Martti’s address. He also communicated care that the donor’s privacy was respected.

Already known, but Satoshi was pretty adamant that early users consider #Bitcoin “free” Here he is discussing removing transaction fees from the UX of an early software. It’s interesting that his reasoning was to obscure this feature from users, but simultaneously acknowledged its necessity in the far future.

Satoshi worked on #Bitcoin on Christmas day. There are some interesting implications here to consider regarding his personal life.

Satoshi saw #Bitcoin taking hold as a way to trade other internet currencies like Liberty Reserve. He also goes on to discuss the potential for markets selling gift cards for bitcoin, which wound up becoming and is to this day a significant market for bitcoin.

Note: Liberty Reserve was later shut down by the US.

Satoshi had a mysterious leave of absence from #Bitcoin in 2010. Here he is talking about it with Martti, though it’s notably also short on details.

It was Satoshi who removed the language that Bitcoin was “anonymous” from http://Bitcoin.org. He worried it made Bitcoin sound “shady.” This echoes his later sentiments around Wikileaks announcing their acceptance of bitcoin for donations.

Worth noting given the historical revisionism around this, Satoshi thought very highly of Gavin Andresen. Here he is praising Gavin and referring to someone else as a “goofball.”

We finally have a copy of the email Satoshi sent other developers before taking his name off the project website. As they’ve said, Satoshi doesn’t mention his intention to step back from the project at all.

Overall no substantial new information is brought to light, but the emails do give a new angle to Satoshi’s interactions with others involved in the project before his departure.

Source