Game developers’ fiery retaliation for OpenSea’s NFT Ban

Within OpenSeason, an open-world combat game reminiscent of Fortnite that is infused with fantasy and memes, the protagonists traverse a landscape replete with crypto-culture allusions, including an amusement park themed after Pepe and avatars representing the Bored Apes and Milady. In this brilliant spectacle, one thing stands out: a blazing shipwreck near the pier, dubbed “OpenSea” after the well-known NFT exchange platform.

This smart gameplay feature was designed to humorously shame OpenSea when it delisted Fractional Uprising Studios’ Ethereum NFTs. In addition to functioning as entry tickets, these passes granted their possessors additional abilities, such as the ability to leave airdrop tokens as benefits or access in-game items.

The Burning Ship’s placement during the Open season was a strategic manoeuvre in retaliation against Opensea’s actions against them, according to an interview with GG in Decrypt featuring Krypticrooks, the founder of Fractional Uprising via Decrypt. Ultimately, the design underwent a complete transformation. Originally portrayed as a tranquil boat moored at the pier, it was subsequently drastically changed to symbolize the studio’s discontent with OpenSea’s action, which was precipitated by the studio’s own insinuations that sparked the burnout.

Its initial tweet of the month incited controversy when Fractional Uprising accused the platform of shamelessly reducing its collection. An examination of the correspondence between OpenSea representatives and customers revealed that the project had been delisted, rendering it accessible only through the NFTs. It was nonetheless required to be tradable on the platform.

According to OpenSea’s explanation to Decrypt, this course of action is initiated when the terms of service are violated, specifically when financial services such as options, securities, commodities, and debt instruments are prioritized. The marketplace’s stance on this subject reflects a policy regarding financial products that result in penalties, such as account closure and delisting of the issuer.

Notwithstanding the concessions extended to the studio, which maintained their project did not involve any security measures, the OpenSea service recommended the cancellation of the project as the sole recourse. This aspect elicits disapproval from the game developers. They emphasized the necessity for greater transparency and the incapability to challenge the decision, alleging that OpenSea was not adhering strictly to the decentralization tenets advocated by Web3.

As a result, it has sparked debate within the digital community, with some considering it to be too corporate and incompatible with the concept of Web3. In addition, the occasion highlights the ongoing debates surrounding governance and the role of venture capital in the NFT marketplace sector, which is increasingly requiring user-centric strategies and shared governance mechanisms.

Source