It’s Safer to Launch Meme Coins Than Useful Cryptos

In the dynamic crypto ecosystem, meme coins seem to dodge the regulatory hurdles that impede more substantive cryptos. While tokens like Dogecoin, born from humor, thrive, entrepreneurs eager to launch utilitarian cryptos face daunting challenges.

This imbalance raises critical questions about US crypto regulations and their impact on innovation.

Andreessen Horowitz General Partner Criticizes US Crypto Regulations

Chris Dixon, a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz leading their crypto fund, has criticized the existing regulatory practices. He points out that these regulations facilitate the proliferation of meme coins at the expense of more innovative, blockchain-based solutions.

According to Dixon, the US crypto regulation unintentionally encourages launching meme coins because they lack practical utility, thus evading the stringent scrutiny applied to potentially transformative technologies.

“It’s actually safer to release a meme coin today with no use case than it is to launch a token that’s useful. Think about it this way: We’d consider it a policy failure if we had a securities market that incentivized only GameStop meme stocks but that rejected the likes of Apple, Microsoft, and NVIDIA — all companies with products people use daily,” Dixon wrote.

Read more: Crypto Regulation: What Are the Benefits and Drawbacks?

This regulatory paradox is clear in the relative ease of creating and launching meme coins. This is because meme coins often do not require a team of developers or a legitimate business plan. They thrive on community engagement and internet culture, often gaining value from sheer speculation rather than underlying utility.

Conversely, developers aiming to introduce blockchain tokens with practical applications encounter a maze of compliance issues. These tokens could revolutionize payment systems, digital authenticity, and decentralized governance but often find themselves mired in what Dixon describes as “regulatory purgatory.”

Additionally, recent initiatives by Andreessen Horowitz, such as its massive $7.2 billion fundraising aimed at sectors like infrastructure and gaming, demonstrate a firm commitment to the potential of these technologies to drive future growth. This is supported by its active role in advocating for regulatory reforms that could level the playing field for serious crypto projects versus meme coins.

SEC’s Approach to Crypto Hinders Innovation

The primary challenge stems from the application of the Howey test by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Established in 1946, this test determines if a crypto qualifies as a security. Its broad interpretation in the context of modern digital assets has been a point of contention.

Despite their decentralized nature, only a few projects like Bitcoin and Ethereum have been recognized by the SEC as not involving managerial efforts, exempting them from certain regulatory requirements. The lack of clear guidelines has led to what many in the crypto sector describe as “regulation by enforcement.”

The call for clearer regulations isn’t isolated to Dixon’s observations. Leaders across the crypto sector have voiced similar concerns.

For instance, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and Haun Ventures CEO Kathryn Haun have publicly criticized the SEC’s approach, particularly its recent actions against platforms like Uniswap. They argue that the SEC’s “regulation by enforcement” creates uncertainty that stifles innovation and equity within the industry.

Read more: What Is the Howey Test and How Does It Impact Crypto?

As the industry calls for better regulation, there’s a growing consensus that clearer crypto regulation could pave the way for more substantial and impactful innovations. By learning from past regulatory oversights and adjusting the approach to digital assets, the US could foster an environment that nurtures both innovation and investor protection.

Source