Just In: US SEC Adds Crypto to its List of 2024 Exam Priorities

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has just announced a significant update by adding cryptocurrencies to its list of exam priorities for 2024.

The SEC Has Evolving Priorities

This decision, however, has raised several important questions about the agency’s stance on the crypto market and the motivations behind this move.

One concern raised by Fox Business News journalist Eleanor Terrett revolves around the allocation of agency resources and the potential use of funds paid by registered companies to regulate an industry that has not been clearly authorized for SEC oversight.

First, it’s important to acknowledge that the crypto industry has been operating in a somewhat regulatory gray area. While the SEC has taken enforcement actions against certain crypto entities for violating securities laws, the overall regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies is still evolving.

Regarding the concern about resource allocation, it’s essential to recognize that regulatory agencies, including the SEC, have the discretion to set their examination priorities based on what they perceive as the most pressing issues. While it may seem that resources and funds from registered companies are being used to address crypto concerns, this approach can be seen as proactive rather than unauthorized.

Given the rapid growth and innovation in the crypto space, the SEC has legitimate reasons to be concerned about investor protection, market integrity, and the need to ensure that industry participants adhere to regulatory standards.

Moreover, the SEC may anticipate that more crypto companies will seek registration with the agency in 2024 or in the near future.

SEC Criticized for Crypto Enforcement Actions

Meanwhile, the SEC has often faced criticism for its approach to regulating the crypto industry, which some have described as “regulation by enforcement.”

This criticism stems from the SEC’s tendency to take legal action against certain crypto companies and projects without providing clear and comprehensive regulatory guidelines, leading to uncertainty and potential legal risks for market participants.

In response to these criticisms, the Chamber of Digital Commerce has taken proactive steps to address what it views as a regulatory overreach by the SEC. The Chamber’s actions reflect its concerns about the impact of the SEC’s approach on the U.S. digital assets market and investors.

Source