Solving the Stablecoin Trilemma: Balancing Decentralization, Stability, and Efficiency

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies that are pegged to some asset, commonly a sovereign currency. Yet, the establishment of stablecoin that is decentralized, pegged to a value and highly capital efficient is not easy. This article focuses on the stablecoin trilemma and its components, comparison of different types of stablecoins, and possible approaches to overcoming the trilemma.

What Is the Stablecoin Trilemma and Why Does It Exist?

The stablecoin trilemma refers to the challenge of designing stablecoins that can simultaneously achieve three key attributes including decentralization, stability in prices and capital intensiveness. These are important for stablecoins, However, finding the optimal balance in all three at the same time has been a major issue.

The concept of the stablecoin trilemma is based on the fact that each of the properties is mutually exclusive to the others. For instance, maintaining price stability may require strong collateral support, which leads to over-collateralization and thus low capital utilization. On the other hand, capital utilization seeks to ensure the least amount of collateral required; however, this creates problems with prices.

Components of the Stablecoin Trilemma

Decentralization

Decentralization is therefore the dispersal of control and decision making from a central authority. In the context of stablecoins, decentralization means that a stablecoin is governed by multiple control points rather than central authorities, and its peg is upheld by protocols and algorithms. In an ideal world, a decentralized stablecoin has no central authority, but most are still partially or fully centralized.

Price Stability

Stability in the price of stablecoins implies that the value of a stablecoin should not fluctuate a lot but rather be anchored to an underlying asset like fiat money. This is important for their application as a form of money and store of value over a given period, especially in volatile markets. For instance, if a stablecoin is tied to USD, 1 of the stablecoin should always be equivalent to 1 USD.

In addition, stablecoins allow people in countries with high inflation rates to save their money securely. For example, in Argentina, the local currency has been unstable, and its value has eroded due to inflation.

Capital Efficiency

Capital efficiency is the quality of a stablecoin in using the backing assets (collateral) to maintain stability of its price. It can be compared it to the amount of value that the stablecoin must maintain to guarantee that every stablecoin is valuable as the unit of measure.

Types of Stablecoins and Their Trade-Offs

Fiat-Backed Stablecoins

Fiat-backed stablecoins are cryptocurrencies that are stabilized by fiat money reserves controlled by a single organization. Examples include Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC). These stablecoins can have a stable price and are capital efficient, using the reserve money efficiently. But they exist in a centralized form, therefore, while the price stability and capital efficiency are achieved, the downside is the absence of decentralization.

Algorithmic Stablecoins

Algorithmic stablecoins rely on algorithms to ensure that their value stays constant through the adjustment of supply. When the price goes up, algorithms produce more coins to maintain the price affordable and if the price goes down, they destroy the excess to make the price go higher. Algorithmic stablecoins are designed as decentralized and capital efficient but their price stability can be an issue. Their stability relies on market demand and algorithms that can falter under pressure.

Crypto-Backed Stablecoins

Other stablecoins are supported by other cryptos. For example, to create $1 of a stablecoin backed by cryptos, a user may have to provide $1.50 of another digital currency such as Ethereum. The additional $0.50 is used to mitigate fluctuations in the value of the collateral and maintain the stablecoin’s price at $1.

Stablecoins backed by cryptocurrencies are usually fully collateralized to counterbalance the fluctuations of the asset. Still, they do provide some decentralization and price stability, but normally are capital non-efficient because of excessive collateral requirements. One popular example of such stablecoin is DAI which pegs directly to ether and other cryptocurrencies to keep its price at $1.

Solving the Stablecoin Trilemma

Hybrid Models

To solve for the stablecoin trilemma, hybrid models incorporate features of different stablecoin categories. For instance, stablecoin can be partially backed up with both fiat and other cryptocurrencies which can help to optimize capital while keeping sufficient decentralization and stability.

Advanced Algorithms

Sophisticated techniques are also employed to make stablecoins more stable and sustainable so that they do not rely heavily on the market trends. Algorithmic stablecoins are capable of hitting extremely high levels of capital efficiency and decentralization. If they can also maintain price stability effectively, they might well be able to solve the trilemma as well. Nonetheless, striking this balance in practice has continued to be a problem.

Insurance and Risk Management

The integration of the insurance mechanism and risk management solutions may serve as an extra layer of protection for stablecoins. It may mean taking provisions for impairment in collateral to mitigate credit risks or devising strategies for dealing with liquidity and volatility risks. In turn, the identified risks may be managed to enhance stablecoins’ stability and reliability.

Final Thought

This means that stablecoins present a trilemma where decentralization, price stability, and capital efficiency are difficult to achieve. Stablecoins can be divided into several types which focus on different aspects of the trilemma. There seems to be no perfect solution, but possible solutions may include the use of hybrid models, new algorithms, and risk management techniques.

Source